Believe In America.com

gringogirl · Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Posts: 187 Location: gone

And yet the greasers whine that it's the gringos' fault that los ilegales
are becoming buzzard feed.

Who Should Pay For Death In The Desert?

By Sam Francis

If you like reparations for slavery, you'll love the lawsuit launched by the
families of 11 dead illegal aliens against the federal government-otherwise
known as the American taxpayer-last week. The aliens are deceased because
they died of thirst while trying to sneak into the United States through a
federally protected wildlife preserve in Arizona. The families are suing
because they claim the government's at fault because it didn't put out water
for them.

If a burglar breaks into your house, trips over a loose cord, and breaks his
neck while falling down the stairs, can his family sue you? That's the logic
of what the aliens' families are doing, but of course the answer, due to the
wacky and wonderful world of American jurisprudence, is perhaps not as
obvious as it should be.

In other words, the aliens may actually be able to get away with it.

For the last several years, the U.S. Border Patrol, under increasing
pressure to control the traffic in illegal immigration across the nation's
southern border, has cracked down on trans-border regions where most
illegals cross. The crackdown has pushed immigrants into other areas that
are not as safe or as populated as the preferred ones. One reason they're
not as safe is that they lack water, and this is one justification for the
lawsuit.

Another justification is that the Interior Department and the Fish and
Wildlife Service, the agencies actually being sued, "failed" to put out
enough water in the preserve to slake the thirsts of the illegal aliens.
"What these agencies knew-or should have known-is that by doing this
[shutting down other border areas], and with a history of deaths in the
desert, these people would cross in these dangerous areas," one of the
aliens' lawyers preaches. "It would have cost the government nothing to put
water stations in, as it had done in other locations."

And indeed "humanitarian" groups had requested the government to establish
water stations for the immigrants.

The government puts water in other locations so that wildlife will have
enough water, not for the convenience of aliens blatantly violating the law.
But be that as it may, the response of government officials so far has been
somewhat disappointing.

The Fish and Wildlife Service says it did receive requests to put out more
water stations but ignored them because "of those places they requested to
place water stations, none of them would have helped the poor people who
perished there," according to an agency spokesman. He also blamed the
immigrant smugglers who guided the aliens into the deserted area.

That's all swell. The aliens who died were indeed poor people-not just
because they died but because they were in fact being exploited by both the
hoodlums they paid to guide them as well as by the phoney humanitarians and
open borders nuts who lure them into this country in the first place.

But the larger point is that at no time has the agency or its spokesmen
asserted that the ultimate blame for the deaths of the poor people trying to
enter illegally must fall on them.

They knew what they were doing was illegal and dangerous-and they did it
anyway.

What is behind the suit, of course, is the concept, dear to the hearts of
the open borders crowd, that the United States has no right to have any
borders anyway and certainly no right or authority to protect its borders
against immigrants or enforce laws against crossing the borders. "There
shall be open borders," the Wall Street Journal repeatedly proclaims in its
favorite proposed constitutional amendment. It's an amendment that many in
the open borders brigades seem to think has already been ratified.

Not only do they concoct every conceivable effort to thwart the Border
Patrol in performing its mission but also they encourage towns and cities on
the border to declare themselves exempt from federal laws against illegal
immigration (e.g., El Cenizo, Texas, a few years ago and others since) and
dream up preposterous law suits to impede enforcement.

The open borders brigade, in other words, is not just a lobby, mobilizing
voters and office holders for and against the laws they like or oppose. It's
also a force for what can only be called subversion-the deliberate
undermining of established federal laws and policies on immigration and
border security.

The spokesmen for the agencies being sued by these forces of subversion need
to point that out-not just pretend they really didn't know where to put the
water supplies.

And they need also to insist on the unpleasant truth about the deaths in the
desert: the aliens who chose to break our laws brought their own grim fates
upon themselves.

http://www.vdare.com/francis/desert.htm

Reply » Rate

Jezzabell · Joined: 03 Jul 2006 Posts: 72

The succession of lawsuits in the past year from illegal's has appauled me. But, it is our judges who allow and are now encouraging this to take place. If they abided by our laws and constitutions they would instead, be enforcing the fact that illegal's have no rights here in America. This is coming from our local governments. Judges until most recently have felt unscaved to the pressure of our movement. But, remember, many many of them are voted into office as well. Do not hesitate to share your feelings with them, and remind them the unemployment line is closer to them than they think.

TxTeacher · Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 64

I'm hoping that one day a judge will grow a pair and say..

judge: "You're representing an illegal trying to sue the government?"
lawyer: "Yes, your honor."
judge: "as defined by the Constitution, an illegal alien has no rights, therefore
they have no case, and I will not hear of it!!"

Perhaps, it's just wishful thinking.......

cornbread · Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 112

The Fox · Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 112

Awww, come on, y'all...that just wouldn't be PC. Common sense and personal responsibility died years ago and are mouldering in their graves.

Their resurrection may come...but it might also be too late.

Bootsie · Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 492

This is just DISGUSTING. Like y'all, I hear cases like this all the time in North Carolina. I have never been able to figure out how these ILLEGALS are allowed to sue OUR government OR any of our businesses.

This brings to mind an incident that occurred several years ago at Duke. A child was brought in who needed a heart transplant. She was illegal. Duke did the heart transplant but, for some reason, a mistake was made and she was given the wrong heart. Duke immediately caught their mistake and replaced the wrong heart with a match for that child. The child was in TERRIBLE SHAPE anyway and she ended up dying DESPITE the noble efforts of the surgeons at Duke. Do you know her parents ended up suing Duke??? Duke finally ended up settling out of court but that case just beat all I've ever heard.

They HAVE NO RIGHTS unless they are here LEGALLY. Our courts are over-burdened as it is. We don't need any frivolous lawsuits tying up our court system and any Judge with a lick of sense would throw this out the window.

butterbean · Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 2271

They have no rights because they are here illegally. Evil or Very Mad

And I dont know about you people, BUT I AM SICK AND TIRED OF BEING REFERRED TO AS A "GRINGO". I FIND THIS OFFENSIVE! ISNT THIS RACIST? Twisted Evil

Bootsie · Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 492

It is VERY racist and insulting. We couldn't get away with calling them "wetbacks", could we?