Complexity of Montana's dilemma is two fold. We have party leaders that can't even vote, and on the other hand we we have respectable leaders who have gone to the extreme of claiming the King James Bible has got to be adhered to.

The true reason for conflict is money.

Few believe as Chuck Baldwin does, that the Republican Party is a sinking ship. Candidate Ron Paul was selected by our Montanan leadership to appeal for cash from the Republican lobby for Ron Paul...but then refused to distribute to all of their Constitution candidates. Their Christian ethics do not stretch as far as their wallet.

The better solution is a closely guarded, regimented system of recruitment without regard to religious affiliation, but on sponsorship. I'd rather sit with a conservative Jew, anytime.

(01-05-2009 06:37 PM)Neal Donohue Wrote:  Complexity of Montana's dilemma is two fold. We have party leaders that can't even vote, and on the other hand we we have respectable leaders who have gone to the extreme of claiming the King James Bible has got to be adhered to.

The true reason for conflict is money.

Few believe as Chuck Baldwin does, that the Republican Party is a sinking ship. Candidate Ron Paul was selected by our Montanan leadership to appeal for cash from the Republican lobby for Ron Paul...but then refused to distribute to all of their Constitution candidates. Their Christian ethics do not stretch as far as their wallet.

The better solution is a closely guarded, regimented system of recruitment without regard to religious affiliation, but on sponsorship. I'd rather sit with a conservative Jew, anytime.

I belive the KJV to be the inheriant infaluble Word of God, but we must realize that our party should welcome people of all faiths as long as they dont comprimise our partys values and morals. If the party wants to go by the Bible only then we would have been in power 25 years ago but in todays age I dont know how we could ever get into power unless we welcome all who enjoy freedom. I think we can do that without comprinising our principles!

(01-07-2009 04:45 PM)Kevhays01 Wrote:  

(01-05-2009 06:37 PM)Neal Donohue Wrote:  Complexity of Montana's dilemma is two fold. We have party leaders that can't even vote, and on the other hand we we have respectable leaders who have gone to the extreme of claiming the King James Bible has got to be adhered to.

The true reason for conflict is money.

Few believe as Chuck Baldwin does, that the Republican Party is a sinking ship. Candidate Ron Paul was selected by our Montanan leadership to appeal for cash from the Republican lobby for Ron Paul...but then refused to distribute to all of their Constitution candidates. Their Christian ethics do not stretch as far as their wallet.

The better solution is a closely guarded, regimented system of recruitment without regard to religious affiliation, but on sponsorship. I'd rather sit with a conservative Jew, anytime.

I belive the KJV to be the inheriant infaluble Word of God, but we must realize that our party should welcome people of all faiths as long as they dont comprimise our partys values and morals. If the party wants to go by the Bible only then we would have been in power 25 years ago but in todays age I dont know how we could ever get into power unless we welcome all who enjoy freedom. I think we can do that without comprinising our principles!

---

(02-25-2009 04:40 PM)fredmontana Wrote:  

(01-07-2009 04:45 PM)Kevhays01 Wrote:  

(01-05-2009 06:37 PM)Neal Donohue Wrote:  Complexity of Montana's dilemma is two fold. We have party leaders that can't even vote, and on the other hand we we have respectable leaders who have gone to the extreme of claiming the King James Bible has got to be adhered to.

The true reason for conflict is money.

Few believe as Chuck Baldwin does, that the Republican Party is a sinking ship. Candidate Ron Paul was selected by our Montanan leadership to appeal for cash from the Republican lobby for Ron Paul...but then refused to distribute to all of their Constitution candidates. Their Christian ethics do not stretch as far as their wallet.

The better solution is a closely guarded, regimented system of recruitment without regard to religious affiliation, but on sponsorship. I'd rather sit with a conservative Jew, anytime.

I belive the KJV to be the inheriant infaluble Word of God, but we must realize that our party should welcome people of all faiths as long as they dont comprimise our partys values and morals. If the party wants to go by the Bible only then we would have been in power 25 years ago but in todays age I dont know how we could ever get into power unless we welcome all who enjoy freedom. I think we can do that without comprinising our principles!

I went to the Constitution party in 2005 held in Great falls, and all they talked about was abortion, and they wanted every one to adopt the Kings James version of the Bible. There were over 200 people at that convention, and the Catholic's said no way. I was very out spoken and try to get the members to go back to the constitution, since we were the Constitution party. One thing I said was if the Constitution was up held ,abortion would be murder, It is Un-Constitution for any elected official to push communism, socialism , or fascism and these people should held responsible, after all they took an OATH to up hold the Constitution. 85% of mothers are in the workforce,who is home raising children. 52% or more of Americas workforce works for government (fed, state ,and local)37% directly,15% indirectly. The main focus of the Constitution party should be to restore the Constitution,and stop focusing on abortion.

Hear, hear! And the Libertarians should stop focusing on drugs! Neither will happen but I agree with you!